Everything Is Nice

Beating the nice nice nice thing to death (with fluffy pillows)


with 3 comments

There is an interesting post by Amy McCulloch over at the Voyager blog about the shift from illustrative to abstract art on genre covers. It is a welcome trend, the move from this to this (to pick two random examples). However, at the end of the piece McCulloch gives an example of Voyager moving in the opposite direction with Stephen Hunt. Here is the old cover of Secrets Of The Fire and the new one:


I can understand why they’ve done it; it is well known that the blander and more generic a cover, the more successful it is with the target audience. At the same time, it is still a shame. I’ve certainly always admired Hunt’s old covers. (Who is responsible? Artists and designers get a bit of a raw deal, these things are often hard to find out.) It is also slightly ironic given the fact McCulloch starts her post by saying:

We also have to be extra careful not to alienate any potential readers as external market research has shown us that sometimes more traditional-looking, illustrative fantasy covers are off-putting for newcomers to the genre… Basically, more graphic, elegant covers are hopefully appealling to our extremely loyal genre fanbase as well as to new readers who perhaps wouldn’t expect to enjoy a ‘fantasy’ novel — and changing the perception of the genre as a whole.

Unrelatedly but speaking of stylised covers, here is the nicest Bible ever (via Caustic Cover Critic):

Written by Martin

15 August 2010 at 07:57

Posted in books, design

Tagged with ,

3 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. You saw this, I assume?


    16 August 2010 at 17:01

  2. I did and I’m really glad Orbit have done it again this year. Good old stats!

    I’m also pleased to here they will also be posting a similar Chart of Fantasy Titles. This will confirm whether my suspicion that they are all either ‘The X Of Y’ or ‘The COLOUR OBJECT’ is correct…


    16 August 2010 at 17:31

  3. And here it is proving that fantasy authors (or perhaps just their publishers) aren’t a very original bunch when it comes to naming their books.


    20 August 2010 at 12:39

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: